‘The Conjuring 2’: Film Review (2024)

They’re ba-aack. Three years after The Conjuring rattled the multiplex with old-school horror, director James Wan ups the ante with an excellent sequel. His focus again is a documented case from the files of the Warrens of Connecticut, the shockingly white-bread demon fighters whose involvement with the so-called Amityville Horror put them on the pop-culture map — and also made them objects of derision. Wan’s expert deployment of genre jolts is no less in evidence this time around, but as he takes his time — perhaps even a bit too much of it — interweaving the Warrens’ story with that of the Hodgsons, in the London borough of Enfield, he crafts a deep dive into dread. The film builds to a symphonic climax of heaven-and-hell emotion.

The returning Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson imbue the roles of Lorraine and Ed Warren with the kind of lived-in nuance that illuminates their recent brilliant work on cable series — Bates Motel and Fargo, respectively, shows that traffic in their own brands of horror. Along with an excellent Madison Wolfe, as the 11-year-old girl who’s tormented by a restless spirit, or perhaps something worse, they lead an ace cast in a terrifically atmospheric plunge into ’70s-vibe melancholy. There’ll be nothing shocking about the feature’s muscle at the box office.

The Bottom LinePrepare to be not just shaken but stirred.

Where the first film found the Warrens in the relative anonymity of their pre-Amityville days, The Conjuring 2 is set a decade later, when the clairvoyant Lorraine has insisted they take a break from case work. It’s not merely an attempt to lay low amid a mounting tide of talk-show scorn; she’s shaken to the core by a vision she had during their Amityville investigation — brought to chilling life in the séance sequence that opens the movie. But when the Catholic Church requests their assessment of a troublingly intractable situation in England, they pack their Bible and go.

The screenplay, credited to Chad Hayes, Carey W. Hayes, James Wan and David Leslie Johnson, structures its based-on-true-events drama as a tale of two households in distress, bringing them together after a somewhat distended hour. For single mother Peggy Hodgson (Frances O’Connor) and her four children, life has turned into a constant state of emergency, especially for Janet (Wolfe), who’s sleepless from being tossed-about, levitated and frequently possessed by an angry entity who claims he wants his home back.

Related Stories

Related Story'Conjuring 2' Director James Wan Reveals His 5 Favorite Scary Movies

That home, a council house with crumbling paint and moldering corners, stands as a gloomy embodiment of domestic despair and economic uncertainty; the children’s father has abandoned the family, and the Thatcher era has dawned. But even as the eerily unfinished basem*nt fills with water, the upstairs bedroom of Janet and her older sister, Margaret (Lauren Esposito), its walls bedecked with David Soul posters, is alive with tween dreams — until it becomes the locus of the family’s nightmare.

The house is an extraordinary creation by production designer Julie Berghoff, one of several key creative collaborators who have worked with Wan on both movies; the others are costume designer Kristin M. Burke, editor Kirk Morri and composer Joseph Bishara, and their contributions are essential to the film’s dark power.

With their clear, direct language and compassion, the Warrens arrive as a source of hope and stability for the Hodgsons, including the two youngest (Benjamin Haigh, Patrick McAuley), and their sympathetic neighbors (Maria Doyle Kennedy and Simon Delaney). Open-minded but unconvinced of the nature of the household’s troubles, Lorraine and Ed can’t dissuade parapsychologist Anita Gregory (Franka Potente) from her aggressive naysaying. (Charges of “children’s pranks” still dog the events in Enfield, which also were the subject of a 2015 British TV series.)

Related Stories

Related StoryNew Line Nabs 'Conjuring' Writers' Firefighter Movie 'The Burn' (Exclusive)

The Warrens’ straightforward earnestness fuels the film, more so than their Catholicism. Amid the chills and thrills, the childhood anxieties and vulnerability, Wan has made a celebration of the demonologist duo’s marriage. (As she was on the first film, Lorraine Warren, 89, is credited as a consultant here, as are three of the Hodgson children.)

In this Conjuring, the haunted-house tropes play second fiddle to something less graspable, even though there’s no question that a game of fright is in full, masterful swing. Cinematographer Don Burgess’ camera prowls and swoops, Bishara’s choral score sends shivers up the spine and Wan uses prolonged silence as well as sounds — creaking floorboards, a screeching backyard swing — to maximum unsettling effect. The director knows how to turn objects, from an antique zoetrope to a ringing telephone, into icons of free-floating evil or, in the case of a crucifix, into tools of redemption.

Yet incidents of Janet’s possession, however well realized, grow repetitive. At the same time, Potente’s character is curiously sidelined for much of the action, when a more thorough integration of her skepticism into the story would only have enriched it.

Another investigator, on the other hand, enhances the pic in unpredictable ways. Played with compelling ambiguity by Simon McBurney, amateur researcher Maurice Grosse begins as something of a well-meaning nuisance, if also a much-needed supporter. The moment when he reveals, in a few guileless words, what drew him to the paranormal, the movie’s stake in matters of love and heartbreak, longing and mourning, is brought into sharp relief.

Related Stories

Related Story'The Conjuring 2' Director Talks Horror Sequels at Film's Premiere

Distributor: Warner Bros.
Production: A New Line Cinema presentation in association with Ratpac-Dune Entertainment of a Safran Company/Atomic Monster production
Cast: Patrick Wilson, Vera Farmiga, Madison Wolfe, Frances O’Connor, Lauren Esposito, Benjamin Haigh, Patrick Mcauley, Simon McBurney, Maria Doyle Kennedy, Simon Delaney, Franka Potente
Director: James Wan
Screenwriters: Chad Hayes, Carey W. Hayes, James Wan, David Leslie Johnson
Story by: Chad Hayes, Carey W. Hayes, James Wan; based on characters created by Chad Hayes and Carey W. Hayes
Producers: Peter Safran, Rob Cowan, James Wan
Executive producers: Toby Emmerich, Richard Brener, Walter Hamada, Dave Neustadter, Steven Mnuchin
Director of photography: Don Burgess
Production designer: Julie Berghoff
Costume designer: Kristin M. Burke
Editor: Kirk Morri
Composer: Joseph Bishara
Visual effects supervisor: Ariel Velasco Shaw
Casting: Anne Mccarthy, Kellie Roy, Rose Wicksteed

Rated R, 134 minutes

‘The Conjuring 2’: Film Review (2024)

FAQs

Is The Conjuring 2 a good movie? ›

The Conjuring 2 is an excellent horror movie and just a flat out great movie in general. From the camera-work to the performances this movie delivers on all fronts. The plot follows a family in poverty in Einfield,England that start experiencing strange happenings in their home.

Which is scarier conjuring 1 or 2? ›

For me I think it's Conjuring 2. I remember it just sticking to my brain for a while longer than the first one did for some reason. The Nun combined with the vibes just felt a lot creepier to me. One of the best scenes between both movies was the Nun portrait scene.

What is the message of The Conjuring 2? ›

Nonetheless, Lorraine faces the demon down and in the process comes to Ed's aid, doing so in such a way that she saves both Ed and Janet. The Conjuring 2 reveals itself to ultimately be a ghost story in which the realm of demons and malicious spirits gives way to the power of love, family, and faith in the end.

What is The Conjuring 2 summary? ›

Is conjuring 2 better than the first? ›

Critics Consensus: The Conjuring 2 can't help but lose a bit of its predecessor's chilly sting through familiarity, but what remains is still a superior ghost story told with spine-tingling skill.

Is The Conjuring 2 based on a true story? ›

The Enfield poltergeist was the subject of the 2015 Sky Living television series The Enfield Haunting, which was broadcast from 4–17 May 2015. The 2016 film The Conjuring 2 is based on Ed and Lorraine Warren's investigation of the case.

Why was The Conjuring 2 banned? ›

John. The Conjuring 2 is being pulled from a number of cinemas in France following reports of 'loud yelling', 'hysterical laughter' and even violent altercations between audience members.

Why is Conjuring 2 so scary? ›

A demon nun is present in the film, and looks a little bit disturbing. There are lots of jumpscares in the film. Some of them are very effective, including a ghost suddenly screaming "MY HOUSE!" behind a girl, and a demon popping out from behind a painting of a creepy nun, while still holding the painting in its hands.

Which Conjuring was the scariest? ›

1. The Conjuring (2013) The movie that started it all remains the tightest, scariest, and most creative of the bunch. In their cinematic debut, the Warrens investigate a disturbing possession at a remote family home in Rhode Island.

Is The Conjuring 2 inappropriate? ›

Parents need to know that The Conjuring 2 is the sequel to 2013's hit horror movie The Conjuring and is also based on real-life ghost hunters Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga). There's some bloody violence, open wounds, and gun shots, but the main issue is just how extremely scary it is.

Who is the evil in conjuring 2? ›

WARNING SPOILERS: So, in "The Conjuring 2", Valak is the evil demon that tortures the Warrens, Bill, and the Hodgsons. Its original plan was to possess Bill's spirit, use him as a pawn to torture the Hodgsons, and then lure the Warrens in, in order to kill Ed. That's a pretty good and intricate plan!

How does Conjuring 2 end? ›

Janet is freed of its possession, and Lorraine pulls her and Ed to safety. After returning home, Ed adds an item to his and Lorraine's collection – a haunted "Crooked Man" zoetrope toy owned by Peggy's youngest child – placing it beside April Perron's music box and the Annabelle doll.

Is conjuring 1 and 2 connected? ›

Well Conjuring (Part 1 ) is indubitably a good horror, but if you are looking forward to watch Part 2 without knowing even the bleak of the previous part then you should go ahead as there are no such any interlinking that could make it cumbersome to understand the story.

What is the message of The Conjuring? ›

The Conjuring tells us to put our faith in God, family, or both and offers a more accurate account of what it takes to traverse the darker times in life. If you are suspicious of this interpretation, ask yourself, would you rather be trapped in a cave with Sarah or with those fanatical Warrens?

Is Conjuring 2 really scary? ›

Parents need to know that The Conjuring 2 is the sequel to 2013's hit horror movie The Conjuring and is also based on real-life ghost hunters Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga). There's some bloody violence, open wounds, and gun shots, but the main issue is just how extremely scary it is.

Which Conjuring movie is best? ›

The Conjuring movies ranked: Best to worst
  • The Conjuring (2013) R | 112 min | Horror, Mystery, Thriller. 7.5.
  • Annabelle: Creation (2017) R | 109 min | Horror, Mystery, Thriller. 6.5.
  • The Conjuring 2 (2016) R | 134 min | Horror, Mystery, Thriller. 7.3.
  • Annabelle (I) (2014) R | 99 min | Horror, Mystery, Thriller. ...
  • The Nun (2018)

What conjuring is the scariest? ›

1. The Conjuring (2013) The movie that started it all remains the tightest, scariest, and most creative of the bunch. In their cinematic debut, the Warrens investigate a disturbing possession at a remote family home in Rhode Island.

Should I watch The Conjuring 2 before 1? ›

The story line of these two movies are completely different. So you can enjoy one without watching the another. Yep, you're good. It's a standalone movie, and it's about the Enfield Poltergeist in England.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jamar Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 6425

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jamar Nader

Birthday: 1995-02-28

Address: Apt. 536 6162 Reichel Greens, Port Zackaryside, CT 22682-9804

Phone: +9958384818317

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Scrapbooking, Hiking, Hunting, Kite flying, Blacksmithing, Video gaming, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Jamar Nader, I am a fine, shiny, colorful, bright, nice, perfect, curious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.